Revised and corrected mechanical translation by
Mgr. Marie Pinkavová and JUDr.
Dalibor Grůza Ph.D. by google.cz and seznam.cz translator of the Czech
original of
the 
Philosophy
of Balance (harmony)
JUDr. Dalibor Grůza Ph.D.
„All living creatures really want to live in a world where everyone likes each other, therefore everyone is obliged to cause the least possible death and pain." Everything else is just my speculation. This applies to all my Philosophy of Balance.
(I.e. the maximum compliance of good and evil individuals, virtually good and evil)
PETITION for the adoption and draft of law on the slaughter tax
|
|
Film: "The Philosophy of Balance
and the slaughter tax. Is nature´s evolution merciful?"
If
one succeeds in accomplishing at least
one case of friendship of two separate viruses or bacteria or living
cells that
would otherwise devour each other, then, in my opinion, the current concept of
Darwin’s theory will
be refuted and it will be possible to replace it with my hypothesis on
the
mercifulness of nature’s evolution, or more precisely, the
ability of all
microorganisms to recognize and remember a friend or enemy in other
microorganisms. The
purpose of this experiment is to refute to a large
extent Darwin's theory of evolution. I intend to prove that the
foundations of
human morality already exist at the microbial level, implying that
religion,
for instance, is not the opium of the people, i.e. some sort of
artificial
creation, but that its foundations are already encoded in the natural
basis,
i.e. in our microorganisms. Thus, in the case of the food chain, there
are
always two choices, either the struggle for life or symbiosis, already
at the
microbial level. This means that the struggle for life in nature is not
inevitable, that already at the microbial level even in the case of
microorganisms which normally devour each other there exists in a
majority of
all instances a choice between the Darwinian struggle for life and
symbiosis,
where the Darwinian struggle for life is always the worst option. In
the
above-mentioned sense, Darwin's theory as an inevitable struggle for
life in
the food chain in nature would be refuted by means of this experiment.
This
general moral behavior towards all living organisms does not then
represent
morality for morality's sake, but morality for the purpose of
symbiosis, which
brings the greatest possible benefits to all involved, whether at the
level of
microorganisms or at the human level. |
The screenplay of the film about Philosophy of Balance
|
7th corrected and revised edition copyleft 2009-2012 Philosophy of Balance and law on slaughter tax WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE OF MY PHILOSOPHY OF BALANCE AND RELIGION? All
religions operate like an opium (as Karl Marx already pointed out),
then as a
drug, which
facilitates human being in a world where is so much pain and death,
depending
on salary of the perfect life of their adherents in the invisible
world and
many religions remove from them the bad conscience of killing
living
creatures. Here, I mean Hindu, which promises salvation from suffering
in this
world-moksha through their fusion with the divine essence, Brahman,
Buddhism,
which promise emptiness-nirvana after death, Judaism and Christianity,
which
promise heaven with God, virtually Jesus of Nazareth may be the
Christ as
the king after the death of a man. These religions
cure, improve with this drug the world by pointing to the
man’s responsibility
for his or her life after death, when using the so-called subconscious
oceanic
feeling in the psyche of every man and in my opinion, as well as of
other
living beings for life in a world where everyone likes each other. Many
of
these religions are also a danger of fanaticism, because that drug
relieves
humans of their evil conscience of killing living creatures through
various
rituals. Philosophy
of Balance is not such a drug, because it promises a reward for its
implementation already visible in
this world (not only after death), in the form of an life of
individual, who
everyone loves and who loves everybody (it is concerned the realization
of the
oceanic feeling of man in this world, a reward of happy life in this
world
promised by an earlier form of Judaism as well, but that in the history
of the
Holocaust of orthodox Jews refuted definitively, the reason for this
tragedy
according to my Philosophy of Balance was that Judaism functioned in
the past,
such as that drug, because it silenced the remorse of killing
especially other
living creatures than humans). Philosophy of the Balance is not the
drug,
because it promises an early change in our world (not only after
death). In a
world where everybody likes each other where all the living creatures
would be
friends for life and death, through the proposed text of the slaughter
tax
(similarly early arrival of our salvation was promised to the world by
early
Christianity through the second coming of Jesus of Nazareth, Christ
maybe, when
this coming did not take place, they resigned early redemption of our
world
and Christian teaching was changed on that drug, promising a
reward to his
followers after their death). Given the above, the Philosophy of Balance is not one of many other religions, but a rational attempt to change our world already in this life, of which success or failure, both in its use in the personal life of individuals as in the case of using the proposed text of the slaughter tax for the whole society, allow its verification (in terms of falsification of scientific theories defined by philosopher Karl Popper), then its confirmation or refutation through a scientific experiment. |
2nd edition copyleft 2010-2012
Application of Philosophy of Balance in material world THE BASIC THEOLOGICAL-PHYSICAL QUESTION: DOES NOTHING OR SOMETHING CAUSE DESTRUCTION? My Philosophy of Balance
understands in physical terms nothing as an absolute vacuum and
destruction as
collisions of mass or electromagnetic waves (ie of something). My
Philosophy of
Balance is based on the fact that the vacuum namely its
underpressure
causes the above mentioned collisions especially gravity, as a result
of this
underpressure a matter or electromagnetic waves stick to themselves,
thus their
collisions. So from a theological perspective my Philosophy of Balance
sees
destruction or collisions or negotiations of the Devil as manifestation
of
nothing or of the absolute vacuum. My Philosophy of Balance in physical
terms
is based on the fact that in our Universe there is not an absolute
vacuum and
in every part of our Universe there is a combination of nothing and
something, therefore,
matter or electromagnetic waves with an absolute vacuum. In other
words, from
the theological point of view, according to my Philosophy of Balance
also the
Devil is a combination of nothing and something and in this part formed
by
something there is determined his good nature.
The above physical basis of my Philosophy of Balance are partially in conflict with the findings of modern physics, in which the attractive especially gravitational force is mainly caused not by an vacuum (or nearly nothing), but it is caused by matter and electromagnetic waves themselves, virtually by their increasing weight. In my opinion theologically it would mean that the destruction or collisions are not caused by nothing but by something that's by its increasing weight. Physically, something as matter and electromagnetic waves are indestructible, because it applies the law of conservation of energy. Theologically, then the most massive something, that would be eternal according to the law of conservation of energy, would be the greatest destructor due to its biggest gravity and by this caused the biggest collisions through the attraction of less massive something. In other words, in my opinion it would mean theologically, that the most massive eternal something as the greatest destructor is the Devil. Thus, theologically, one might say that God is actually the Devil. Socially, it would mean that powerful individual must strive to become more powerful individual not to be always cut down, that is destroyed sooner or later with him or her colliding even more powerful individuals or with him or her colliding a large number of less powerful individuals, because the powerless individual will be always cut down by a more powerful individual or individuals sooner or later. Then the position of individuals in society would be havenless waiting for a random deadly collision. The only recourse of individual would represent subordination that the individual increases his or her power (see Nietzsche's Will to Power). Rightness of my Philosophy of Balance as a benefit for the individual causing the least possible pain and death of living creatures against Nitzsche's opinion to the will to power at any cost (see above), in my view, can confirm or refute physics by the experimental refutation or proof of above physical starting point of my Philosophy of Balance, that gravity is caused by underpressure of vacuum. |
